| SUMMARY OF RESPONSES FROM PRIESTS | ||||||||
| Replies from Priests: 30, including 16 Forms | ||||||||
| Questions | YES | NO | ||||||
| Design and Use of Form | ||||||||
| Do priests find the information given on Part A of the Form | ||||||||
| (the part which is be kept by the Priest and NOT passed | ||||||||
| to the school) useful in formulating their response to part B of the Form? | 14 | 1 | ||||||
| (If No, why not?) | Most parents exaggerate or lie about their practice | |||||||
| Is there anything that could be usefully added or removed? | 7 | 6 | ||||||
| (If Yes, what?) | Add details of the parents' marriage | |||||||
| Form should be factual only, omit: reason for non-attendance etc., involvement in parish activities, reasons for wanting a Catholic school. | ||||||||
| Remove "Reconciliation". | ||||||||
| Add parents block to "certify true information" | ||||||||
| A request to use capital letters and make it make idiomatically English! | ||||||||
| Make clearer that the reverse should be completed by the parents. | ||||||||
| If not a Catholic - what religion i.e. Orthodox and other non Roman Rite Christians (sic) | ||||||||
| Have a form like Oratory / Vaughan / Sacred heart / Thomas More | ||||||||
| Should the form be: | ||||||||
| (a) sent to the priest by the school? | 6 | 9 | ||||||
| (b) brought to the priest by the parent? | 10 | 5 | Definitely (always) after Sunday Mass | |||||
| It should be sent direct and confidentially to the school by the priest | ||||||||
| Should the priest be: | ||||||||
| (a) encouraged to interview the parents? | 12 | 2 | No, its the one's I don't know I need to meet | |||||
| (b) discouraged from interviewing the parents? | 1 | 10 | ||||||
| (c) or should it be left to the priest's discretion? | 8 | 1 | ||||||
| Discourage from interview and priest's discretion not mutually exclusive concepts! | ||||||||
| I think it should be obligatory to injterview both the parents and child | ||||||||
| Prefer the word "visit" to "interview" | ||||||||
| Find discussing form with parents very useful pastoral contact | ||||||||
| In plenty of time, long lead time | ||||||||
| Could the design of Part B of the Form be | ||||||||
| improved to make it more objective? | 3 | 8 | ||||||
| (If Yes, how?) | Some parts could bring greater consistency | |||||||
| Delete "I support this application - not objective and could invite hostility" | ||||||||
| Remove Question 4 | ||||||||
| Define "practising", individuals or whole family? | ||||||||
| Do priests wish to keep the opportunity, in exceptional cases, | ||||||||
| to support an application where there is no practice? | 15 | 1 | Yes, in any case: see Bps Statement '96 - para entitled "Education of all" & Roman view of schools for evangelisation | |||||
| Yes, but very rarely | ||||||||
| (If No, why not?) | Need to keep factual: Fear of legal minefield if exceptional cases allowed | |||||||
| Should: | ||||||||
| (a) the priest inform the parents of the outcome of the | Yes, The whole process must be objective and as transparent as possible | |||||||
| reference (returning Part B to the school via the parents)? | 9 | 6 | Yes, during interview | |||||
| (b) the school inform the parents of the outcome after the | ||||||||
| Priest returns Part B of the Form directly to the school? | 6 | 9 | Priest to inform parents, priest to return form to school | |||||
| Guidance to be given to Priests | ||||||||
| Should there be more guidance on the operation of | In particular to ethnic chaplains | |||||||
| Priest's Reference Forms which is specifically | Priests should be encouraged to visit homes | |||||||
| directed at priests? | 9 | 3 | How will schools deal with Priests with different views and agendas? | |||||
| Possibly, but not at the moment | ||||||||
| In particular, should priests be given more detailed | ||||||||
| guidance on the following aspects of the process: | ||||||||
| how the forms should be used by schools? | 10 | 2 | possibly | |||||
| how best to maximise the pastoral potential of the | ||||||||
| information on Part A of the Form? | 9 | 3 | Parishioners appreciate it when they see a reference which proves the parish priest genuinely knows them | |||||
| filling in part B of the Form? | 8 | 3 | Could be helpful in some cases | |||||
| the definition of 'practising Catholic' to be applied for the | ||||||||
| purposes of school admissions? | 13 | 1 | ||||||
| circumstances in which they might use the opportunity to support | ||||||||
| an application where there is no practice? | 12 | 0 | ||||||
| any other aspects of the process? (If Yes, on what?) | Dealing with appeals | |||||||
| The more explicit the guidance, the less chance of "weakest links" devaluing the process | ||||||||
| Diocese should formulate policy for when a new parish priest is in position: | ||||||||
| maybe the previous p.p. could be available to see parents on a particular day to complete forms | ||||||||
| A written explanation of "non-current practise" preference to hand to parents who do not get a place | ||||||||
| Guidance on how to deal with a parent who insists that they are practising but the pp does not know them/or indeed seen them. | ||||||||
| General Comments: | Priests should only be asked to indicate the actual practice of the family, | |||||||
| quite factually e.g. Weekly, Fortnightly, Three Weekly, Monthly, Less frequently. | ||||||||
| Should be made clear to schools that this is the ONLY form that priests will sign, NOT forms designed by schools | ||||||||