Thoughts/Gripes/Ravings about: arch2.gif


Traditional English archery

The traditional English Rounds (see British Outdoor Rounds) with their five zone, 9, 7, 5, 3, 1, scoring are the very nature of the sport for me. The variety of rounds available gives us the opportunity to shoot from 12 to 4 dozen arrows: utilising our time, the light available, weather conditions, etc. to suit us. These rounds are steeped in history and tradition.
When I last shot in earnest, some 22 years ago, very little was heard about F.I.T.A. rounds. Nowadays the top archers seem to prefer the F.I.T.A. rounds so they can gain points for International team positions. So much so that the traditional rounds appear to be losing ground and talk of making them more like the F.I.T.A. rounds, with strict timing, 'traffic lights', etc. seems likely to become reality. LEAVE THEM ALONE....I like to shoot both. Both F.I.T.A. rounds and our English rounds are good to shoot, they offer different aspects to the sport. There is no point in making our rounds like the F.I.T.A. rounds, we may as well shoot only the F.I.T.A. rounds.
A York round is wonderful to shoot. Six dozen arrows at 100 yards can surely separate the men from the boys! I think points awarded for York rounds should carry equal weight with those gained for F.I.T.A. rounds, the squad training camps can take care of the rest of the selection process.
email.gif R.S.V.P.
Dislikes
While I'm having a bit of a rant I'd like to get something else off my chest:.....the use of expressions like BULL and FIRE used in the archery context!!!
Bull is a darts term, please don't use it to mean GOLD.
Fire is associated with firearms, please use SHOOT.
Silly what people accept/reject isn't it? But I really do hate those expressions being wrongly used - sorry, that's the way it is.

Back to Top to top

Back to Archery Home Page to previous