The Nature of Design

Item Posted By: Bob Welch

It is an interseting point you raise - the distinction ( if there is one) between the subject itself and the teaching of the subject. This applies to all areas. How is school mathematics related to "real world" mathematics; what of school 'English', 'Art'? Also, what is the "real world" - - whose world?

As an in-service provider I have always been intersted in discussing with teachers if there is a distinction to be drawn between teaching D&T, learning D&T and undertaking D&T-ish activity. The current Order tries to look at this by defining what should be taught (no mention of how) and what can be reasonably expected of a student. It is not ideal but represents an attempt to provide an entitlement for all pupils in this realm of the curriculum.

If the D&T teacher community is serious about the subject remaining part of the statutory school curriculum then time is running out to sort the situation in schools and create a general 'feel good factor' about the subject. The crucial area that seems to be missing is teacher confidence to experiment and try out new ideas and approaches. This is very difficult indeed in the current climate of judgement of schools by exam results, etc. Perhaps your forum can help stimulate some ideas and discussion.

• 1. Bob Welch
  
  • 1.1. John Bilton
    
    • 1.2. Bob Welch